# The transient heterogeneous Neuman solution from 2004

We provide the transient pumping solution for the apparent transmissivity from Neuman 2004. This solution is build on the apparent transmissivity from Neuman 2004, which represents a mean drawdown in an ensemble of pumping tests in heterogeneous transmissivity fields following an exponential covariance.

In the following this solution is compared to the standard theis solution for well flow. You can nicely see, that the extended solution represents a transition between the theis solutions for the well- and farfield-conductivity.

Reference: Neuman 2004

```import numpy as np
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt

from anaflow import neuman2004, theis
```

We use three time steps: 10s, 10min, 10h

```time_labels = ["10 s", "10 min", "10 h"]
time = [10, 600, 36000]  # 10s, 10min, 10h
```

Radius from the pumping well should be in [0, 4].

```rad = np.geomspace(0.05, 4)
```

Parameters of heterogeneity, storage and pumping rate.

```var = 0.5  # variance of the log-transmissivity
len_scale = 10.0  # correlation length of the log-transmissivity
TG = 1e-4  # the geometric mean of the transmissivity
TH = TG * np.exp(-var / 2.0)  # the harmonic mean of the transmissivity

S = 1e-4  # storativity
rate = -1e-4  # pumping rate
```

Now let’s compare the apparent Neuman solution to the classical solutions for the near and far field values of transmissivity.

```head_TG = theis(time, rad, S, TG, rate)
time=time,
trans_gmean=TG,
var=var,
len_scale=len_scale,
storage=S,
rate=rate,
)
time_ticks = []
for i, step in enumerate(time):
label_TG = "Theis(\$T_G\$)" if i == 0 else None
label_TH = "Theis(\$T_H\$)" if i == 0 else None
label_ef = "transient Neuman " if i == 0 else None
plt.plot(
)
plt.plot(
)

plt.xscale("log")
plt.xlabel("r in [m]")
plt.ylabel("h in [m]")
plt.legend()
ylim = plt.gca().get_ylim() 